PORNOGRAPHY VIEWING CAUSES BRAIN DAMAGE IN THE MALE INTERNET PORN ADDICT

28 09 2010

Gazing at the Grand Canyon Through a Straw
Imagine you are a tour guide leading a column of tourists up a winding path to a point overlooking one of the vast natural wonders of the world. Upon reaching the summit, a curious thing happens: Each tourist takes out a drinking straw and, closing one eye, places it up to the open eye and looks through it. There they stand, your little group, taking in the beautiful vista spread before them through soda straws! You hear comments like: “What an interesting rock,” “That’s a lovely leaf on that tree,” or, “There’s a beautiful patch of blue water.” Finally, in total exasperation, you holler, “For crying out loud, get rid of the straws and look! This is the Grand Canyon, folks!” As ridiculous as this may sound, this is how men and teenage boys hooked on pornography often see their own life and other people (especially women)-through the narrow conduit of a drinking straw. Pornography fosters the most insidious form of “tunnel vision.”

The Story of Jack

A person hooked on pornography develops a one-track mind. His focus in life becomes single-minded and his view of others, especially of women, narrows.

In her book An Affair of the Mind, Laurie Hall shares the true-life story of her husband Jack, who had been severely addicted to pornography for over 20 years. She writes:

After indulging in fantasy for more than 20 years, Jack lost his ability to think about anything else. Dwelling so much on that which wasn’t true made him unable to think about that which was true. He lost his common sense and his ability to solve problems.

My husband, once a brilliant engineer, couldn’t even figure out how to turn a freezer so it would fit through the door into the cellar. He was absentminded in the extreme. He’d turn on the stove to make tea, forget to put the kettle on, and just walk out of the kitchen with the burner glowing red. He’d put wood into the wood stove and leave the door open, causing chimney fires. In the morning, it wasn’t unusual to find the outside door standing wide open. He’d have gone out for something the night before and forgotten to close it when he came in.

Sometimes, when someone would ask him a question, he would start to answer, only to stop halfway into the reply and then freeze with his mouth open. His mind had gone completely blank.

Jack always said he wanted other people to think he had it all together. So, for a long time, when other people were around, he’d manage the Herculean effort of staying focused enough so that only the most alert could see that he wasn’t tracking well. In the end, though, his checking out became apparent to people besides the children and me.

Too much time fantasizing meant that he also lost his ability to do his work well. Finally, the man who was recognized three times as an outstanding employee was fired for being incompetent and lying to his boss. Once a regional manager for a large company, overseeing millions of dollars worth of equipment and managing half a dozen men, Jack had an expense account, a cellular phone, a company vehicle, and a comfortable middle-class salary.

Today, he is doing production work, packing 12-ounce bags of chocolates at $7.25 an hour. He stands at an assembly line seven-and-a-half hours a day, catching bags that come off the machine at a rate of 71 a minute. Then he puts them into boxes-24 to a box. Sometimes he scrapes chocolate off the factory floor. And every day when he leaves home, he carries his briefcase.

If he forgets it, he comes back in to get it. He needs to remember what he was before he was brought to a piece of bread by means of a whorish woman. (Proverbs 6:26)

Laurie felt strongly that her husband had somehow damaged his brain and lost touch with reality through his pornography viewing and fantasizing. Of course, having no scientific backing for this theory, most people thought it was a ridiculous assumption. Still she writes:

It wasn’t until Jack and I were separated and we met with Dr. Ron Miller that my observations were verified. After examining Jack, Dr. Miller looked at him and said: “You’ve destroyed your mind by fantasizing. You’ve dug a deep channel going in one direction. The rest of your mind is atrophied!”

When I first found Laurie Hall’s book on the Internet, I read some reviews that had been submitted by readers. All were extremely positive and complimentary, except for one. And that one negative response was so typical of the complete ignorance and arrogance regarding the effects of pornography on the male brain and body, that I must quote it here. This reader’s critical comments were as follows:

What a waste this book was. It is certainly horrible when a man destroys his life for pornography! But the majority of people who look at pornography do not destroy their lives over it! Porn is a hobby just like any other hobby! Does that mean that all pornography is bad and should be banned? Thousands of people die every year in automobile accidents, so does that mean that automobiles are bad and should be banned? She thinks that her opinion is right and that anyone who disagrees with her is wrong! This book presents a very ignorant view of pornography! The author has a lot to learn! What a waste of time!

I find it fascinating that this reader-critic would refer to the author as an ignorant woman who “has a lot to learn.” It seems to me that after living with a porn addict for 20 years, Laurie Hall has experienced firsthand the true nature of pornography and its highly toxic effects.

The reader-critic also asserts that porn does not destroy the lives of the majority of people who look at it. With the overwhelming personal examples, facts and research results that we now have, this reader is most definitely the one who has a lot to learn.

What’s more, this reader-critic claims that porn is a hobby, similar to stamp collecting, rock climbing, oil painting-there’s no difference, right? Of course, when compared against a standard of what benefits our society, porn fails to measure up. This reader-critic is like the person who points at the perfectly healthy, 90-year-old codger who has smoked cigarettes all his life and exclaims, “See, I told you that cigarettes only harm a few people!”

I’ve just two words to say to such nonsense: Wake up!

How Does Pornography Viewing Cause Brain Damage?
I want to share with you a body of scientific facts that supports Dr. Ron Miller’s diagnosis of Laurie Hall’s husband, when he said, “You’ve destroyed your mind by fantasizing. You’ve dug a deep channel going in one direction. The rest of your mind is atrophied!”

Dr. Gary Lynch, a neuro-scientist at the University of California at Irvine, in discussing how the human brain processes information received from the outside world, said: “What we are saying here is that an event which lasts half a second, within five to ten minutes has produced a structural change that is in some ways as profound as the structural changes one sees in [brain] damage.”

Further commenting on how a word or image can immediately alter the brain structure, Dr. Lynch says, ” . . . in a matter of seconds, taking an incredibly modest signal, a word . . . which is in your head as an electrical signal for no more than a few seconds, can . . . leave a trace that will last for years.”

In the book The Brain and Nervous System, it states:

. . . Our thoughts, feelings and memories exist as particular patterns of nerve messages, passing repeatedly along certain pathways in the brain. Each message would burn a specific pathway among the billions of axons and dendrites.

In my research of numerous scientific papers, experiments and studies, one thing stands out: Stored away in the cells of your brain and body are all the things you have ever seen, heard, felt, tasted or smelled. That’s why Dr. Miller was able to tell Jack after 20 years of porn, “You’ve destroyed your mind by fantasizing. You’ve dug a deep channel going in one direction.” Jack had literally developed a one-track mind.

After reading about Jack, there are some who will say, “That’s a rather extreme example. I’m sure that there are men who look at pornography and don’t end up like Jack.”

True enough, but I think most people would be shocked at just how many Jacks are out there whose brains and lives have been devastated by long-term porn addiction. And I can guarantee you, with the porn floodgates wide open on the Internet, the number of “Jacks” in the world is soaring.

Your Own Private Mobile Porn Library and Video Store
In previous articles I have already discussed the fact that once cellular-memory groups and neural pathways are formed in your brain and body, you don’t necessarily require outside stimuli to access and activate them. You can call up the images, feelings and information simply by using your imagination, another tool that pornographers use to their advantage.

The makers of porn know that the erotic images stored in the male brain are so potent that they can be activated merely by a word, a woman walking by, or a passing thought. For men who are trying to overcome porn addiction, this automatic response mechanism can be a major source of frustration and discouragement.

Cellular-memory groups storing pornographic images and the neural pathways leading to them are so deep and entrenched that their influence can permeate the whole mindbody network. In a porn user’s brain and body, there are so many cellular-memory groups associated with porn images that they can be activated from a thousand different kinds of outside stimuli-or, many times, for no apparent reason at all.

Porn addicts trying to overcome their addiction say that pornographic images will pop into their minds at the worst times: in church, during prayer, during a job interview, while chatting with a son or a daughter, and, worst of all, amid intimate relations with their wife.

These men are in for a lifelong struggle; the cellular-memory groups where these images are stored will always be there to beckon them back to the computer screen. A relapse is always a possibility. Pornographers know that there is a good chance they will reclaim as customers men who are trying to overcome porn addiction, because many give up in despair when the images keep barging back into their minds.

For other men and teens who are caught up in porn addiction but are making no effort to stop, stored porn images become a way to look at porn in the privacy of their own minds. It’s like having a mobile porn library of photos and videos to draw from at any time, night or day.

Hours better spent at productive work, with family, serving others, etc. are instead wasted in hours of private fantasy. Otherwise good, hardworking men become so distracted by their fantasies that they become zombies. They are present in body but their minds are lost in a pornographic wasteland.

Another common problem for men addicted to porn is that they become walking time bombs that can be set off at any time and without warning. In truth, no woman or child is entirely safe around a pornoholic.

In next month’s article we’ll look at how pornography destroys marriage relationships.

Mark B. Kastleman is the author of the revolutionary new book titled The Drug of the New Millennium-the Science of How Internet Pornography Radically Alters the Human Brain and Body-A Guide for Parents, Spouses, Clergy and Counselors. Many leading scientists, psychologists, therapists and religious leaders consider this book to be one of the most important works ever written on this subject, and a must-read for parents, spouses, clergy and counselors.





BAHAYA CINTA PREMATURE & IMMATURE by Julianto Simanjuntak

2 07 2010

Pengalaman konseling terhadap keluarga yang bermasalah, kasus suami istri yang penuh konflik saya temukan salah satu penyebabnya adalah pernikahan yang dilandasi cinta yang premature dan immature. Cinta yang tidak matang dan yang dipaksakan keadaan. Meski orang beralasan menikah karena cinta, namun sesungguhnya bukan cinta yang mendorong mereka menikah. Lewat penelitian Lederer dan Jackson ditemukan bahwa cinta ternyata bukanlah menjadi alasan utama orang menikah. Ada beberapa alasan lain (yang lebih dominan) yang mendorong orang menikah, antara lain: karena kehamilan, tekanan sosial (misalnya dari orangtua menginginkan mereka segera menikah). Ada juga karena pengaruh buku-buku romantis dan tradisi (adat). Ada juga karena ingin lepas dari rasa kesepian dan kebosanan. Ada juga disebabkan takut akan keadaan ekonomi di masa depan.

Ada yang menikah karena merasa dengan menikah hidup lebih lengkap. Banyak orang menikah dengan alasan saling mencintai, namun mereka memahami cinta hanya sebagai psychological phenomena. Artinya, hanya kebetulan ada perasaan attracted atau passion (khususnya kaum remaja yang sedang bertumbuh hormon seksual – dimana daya tarik seksual lebih kuat daripada daya tarik pribadi). Misalnya melihat wajah cantik, kekayaan atau kepandaian; atau karena adanya kesempatan tertentu, sering ketemu lalu bergaul kemudian muncul perasaan cinta (witing tresno jalaran soko kulino). Lama-kelamaan, ketika muncul kesadaran baru, ia merasa pacarnya sebenarnya tidak terlalu menarik. Tetapi karena sudah mengikatkan diri, sulit untuk mundur. Terlambat. Ironisnya, kalau ketemu orang lain yang lebih baik, cantik/ ganteng dan menarik, mudah juga putus.

Oleh karena beberapa saran sederhana saya bagi kaum muda yang sedang bergumul dengan menemukan salah satu sahabat yang hendak dijadikan pacar atau akan menikah:

Pertama, janganlah Anda menggerakkan cinta sebelum waktunya. Raja salomo nan bijak menegaskan bahwa sekali Anda menggerakkan cinta, maka sulit mengontrolnya kembali. Salomo berkata Air yg banyak tidak dapat memadamkan cinta. Khususnya, jika Anda masih remaja/muda dan belum matang secara emosi/karakter dan sosial Anda bisa mengorbankan siapapun demi apa yang anda sebut “cinta”. Kamu bisa mengorbankan studi, kebiasaan baik, teman baik bahkan Orangtua Anda. Tak jarang ada yang mengorbankan Iman alias menggadaikan Cinta Anda kepada Tuhan sang Penebus hidupmu

Kedua, Cinta yang tidak matang seringkali digantikan dengan kesenangan, uang dan fasilitas. Beberapa mereka yang tumbuh dalam keluarga tanpa cinta tapi melimpah uang dan kesenangan, akan menggunakan hal yang sama untuk mendapatkan cinta seseorang. Dia menawarkan kesenangan – kenikmatan – dan uang. Namun Si Bijaksana Salono berkata “ sekalipun ada orang yang memebri sgala harta untuk cinta ia pasti akan dihina (Kid.8:47).

Ketiga, penting sekali untuk memahami life-structure masing-masing. Life-structure ditentukan oleh faktor herediter dan pembentukan atau pengalaman belajar masa kanak-kanak. Sebaiknya kenalilah dengan baik karakter pasangan Anda dan faktor-faktor apa yang membentuknya sejak dia kecil. Sebab itu masa-masa itu banyak membentuk pribadinya sekarang. Setelah itu cobalah pertimbangkan dengan matang, apakah Anda bisa hidup berpuluh-puluh tahun kemudian dengan orang seperti itu.

Keempat, selama Anda bersahabat dan mencoba memilih pacar diantara sahabat Anda waspadai hal-hal berikut ini: Hindari tipe pria/wanita perayu-penggoda, dan permisif (tdk punya komitmen moral – biasanya dibesarkan dalam keluarga yang “lapar cinta”). Juga waspadai orang yang penuh janji muluk tapi tak pegang janji serta sesungguhnya egois-tidak siap menderita. Sebaliknya Temukan dan bangunlah hubungan istimewa dengan orang yang anda percayai – dapat diandalkan, beriman – setia, dan anda betul-betul kenal dgn baik dan siap menerima dia apa adanya (bukan apa adanya) – demikian juga sebaliknya.

Sebagai kesimpulan: Sabarlah menjalani masa remaja (muda) Anda. Bergaullah seluas-luasnya dengan lawan jenis Anda untuk mengenal dunia yang berbeda dengan Anda. Bersahabatlah dengan mantap sebelum memutuskan berpacaran. Sampai akhirnya Anda menemukan ‘teman’ yg sepadan. Jika Anda menemukan “pada waktunya” dan “orang yang tepat” maka itulah yang akan menyelamatkan Anda pribadi –karir anda, pernikahan anda dan keturunan (sambungan keturunan dari ortumu) selamanya. Itulah tanda bakti terbaik anda kepada orangtua, yakni memilih teman hidup yang tepat dan sesuai, yang bisa meneruskan keturunan yang tangguh dan menjadi berkat. Jika engkau salah memilih, salah menikah dan menghasilkan pernikahan yang buruk, secara tidak langsung Anda sudah “membunuh” ke atas. Biayanya terlalu mahal! Karena itu bijaklah bersahabat dan memilih calon teman hidup.

*) Selengkapnya tentang MEMILIH TEMAN HIDUP & MERAWAT PERNIKAHAN bacalah buku: Mengubah Pasangan Tanpa Perkataan (Pesan: SMS 021-70555705) atau email: konseling_lk3@cbn.net.id
Info Training PREMARITAL COUNSELING lihat www.pedulikonseling.or.id

Yayasan Peduli Konseling Nusantara
www.pedulikonseling.or.id
Yayasan Peduli Konseling Nusantara





Christian Bale Was Possibly Set to Play Superman?

25 06 2010

March 15th, 2010

Actor Christian Bale has certainly made the most out of his two performances as Bruce Wayne/Batman but it was recently revealed that Bale could’ve played yet another DC superhero for Warner Bros. MTV Splash Page recently spoke with director Wolfgang Petersen who revealed that Christian Bale was one of his top choices to play Superman in the film that never was, Batman vs. Superman.

Petersen said that the role of Superman was down to just Bale and one other actor, Josh Hartnett, and Petersen said the film almost went forward.

“It was pretty close,” said Petersen. “And then the studio got a single Superman script I think from J.J. Abrams at that time, and [Warner Bros. chief] Alan Horn was so torn – because it’s such a fascinating concept to do a Batman versus Superman film. And I still think it would be to do that. But the studio decided to try separate version of Superman and Batman, and then maybe think about down the road if you want to bring them together in one film.”

Both Petersen’s film and the Abrams Superman project fell through and the studio ended up moving forward with Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins in 2005, which lead to the mega-blockbuster 2008 sequel The Dark Knight as well as Bryan Singer’s 2006 film Superman Returns.

It was said that one of the factors that shut down Petersen’s film was that the studio had just greenlit his Green war epic, Troy.

The Dark Knight was released July 18th, 2008 and stars Christian Bale, Heath Ledger, Aaron Eckhart, Michael Caine, Maggie Gyllenhaal, Gary Oldman, Morgan Freeman, Monique Gabriela Curnen. The film is directed by Christopher Nolan.





Will Chris Nolan Recast the Joker for Batman 3 or Will the Riddler Take His Place?

25 06 2010

June 29th, 2008

Movie Picture While conducting interviews with the cast of The Dark Knight this afternoon, I got a chance to chat with director Christopher Nolan and Gary Oldman about the proposed third segment of their supposed Batman trilogy. While none of us in attendance really wanted to dwell on the death of Heath Ledger, Oldman offered his thoughts on the actor’s portrayal of the Joker, calling it the scariest on-screen performance he’s ever seen. He even went on to compare it to his own work as Sirius Black, saying, “Sirius Black might scare six year olds, but he doesn’t scare nine year olds. It’s hard to scare kids these days. Heath does. He scares everybody. This is one of the most frightening performances I have ever seen put on film.” When asked if he thought they should recast Ledger for the third film, or just not include the character, Gary thought it was a good idea, “I don’t see why not. I mean, they did it with Katie Holmes’ character. I understand that this is a different circumstance, but I think another actor could do the job. I think Heath would want another actor to do the job.” Oldman then took a moment to think about it some more, “Maybe we don’t need the Joker. Because we’ll have The Riddler.” Yes, Oldman alluded to the fact that The Riddler may in fact be the next on-screen Batman villain. When I asked if he, himself, wanted to come back for a third segment, he smiled coyly, “We don’t really know if Nolan is coming back.” He then shook his head. “I guess I have to come back.” He then put his hand to the side of his mouth as if to hide the next line from everybody, “Nolan will come back for a third one. I think we all have to.” It is well known that Oldman tried to get out of appearing in The Dark Knight, but his contract wouldn’t allow it. Next, I asked Christopher Nolan if he wanted to come back for a third Batman film, and he said that he wasn’t sure that he wanted to come back, “I don’t know. I take my projects one at a time, and I am not thinking about that right now. I don’t know if I want to come back.” After that, I asked, “If you do choose to make a third Batman film, do you think that you would recast for the Joker? Or will he not appear in the film?” Nolan’s replay, “I don’t know. I honestly have not taken a moment away from what is going on with the film now to even think about that. I don’t know. I simply don’t know.”

http://www.movieweb.com








Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.